{"id":372,"date":"2018-01-14T22:11:51","date_gmt":"2018-01-14T21:11:51","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.veganfinance.org\/?page_id=372"},"modified":"2023-07-13T13:22:29","modified_gmt":"2023-07-13T11:22:29","slug":"scoring-explanations","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/veganfinance.org\/fr\/scoring-explanations\/","title":{"rendered":"Scoring methodology"},"content":{"rendered":"\n\n\n\t\n\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t
Score<\/th>Rating<\/th>Condition<\/th>Exemple 1<\/th>Exemple 2<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n
+2<\/td>V\u00e9gan<\/td>#Zero harm<\/strong> on animals, veganism is integrated in the business model<\/strong>, vegan activities are material
\n#Or zero harm<\/strong> with significant beneficial actions<\/strong> for animals
\n
\n<\/td>		A car company that does not use animal leather and has developed innovative vegan products as animal detection to avoid collision with animals. Its environmental performance is on the upwards.<\/td>A clothing company that does not use animal products and sells innovative vegan products made with synthetic down or premium synthetic leather<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
+1<\/td>Conforme v\u00e9gan<\/td>#Zero harm<\/strong> on animals either by direct activity, value-chain, sponsoring or financing
\n<\/td>		An IT consulting company that does not directly exploit animals and has no indirect impact on animals through sponsoring<\/td>A clothing company that has definitely stopped selling products made from animal sources (no leather, no down, no feather, no skins, no fur, etc.)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
0<\/td>Transition \/ Neutral<\/td>#Some harm<\/strong> with high animal-welfare standards<\/strong>
\n#Or neutral-for-animal industry but some harm<\/strong> is due to sponsoring or ESG issues
\n#If there is any animal harm, no total offset is possible, the company can never be rated vegan compliant<\/strong>
\n<\/td>		Une soci\u00e9t\u00e9 d'\u00e9nergie non-renouvelable qui a commenc\u00e9 sa transition vers des \u00e9nergies renouvelables<\/td>A clothing company that still sells down jacket, with animal-welfare standards that guarantee no live pluck and no forced-feed, and has committed to stop the use of animal products at a close date in the future<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
-1<\/td>Non conforme v\u00e9gan<\/td>#Massive harm<\/strong> on animals with some animal-welfare standards<\/strong> and commitments measurable by metrics
\n#Or the activity causes occasional harm<\/strong> and is not a core business<\/strong>
\n<\/td>		An oil company that makes hydraulic fracking and has not significantly start its transition to renewables energies<\/td>Une soci\u00e9t\u00e9 de v\u00eatement qui vend des parkas faits de duvet mais qui respecte des standards de bien-\u00eatre animal garantissant l'absence de plumage \u00e0 vif et de gavage<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
-2<\/td>Non v\u00e9gan<\/td>#Animal exploitation \/ suffering is a core business<\/strong> or an indirect consequence of the activity
\n#Or Massive or repeated harm<\/strong>
\n#Or no \/ weak commitments<\/strong>, no measurable outcomes, weak results
\n<\/td>		A pharmaceutical company that still does tests on animals after years of commitment to reduce and replace<\/td>Une soci\u00e9t\u00e9 de v\u00eatements qui vend des parkas en duvet issu de canards qui ont \u00e9t\u00e9 gav\u00e9s ou plum\u00e9s vivants<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n\n
Presentation of the VF methodology<\/h5>\n